I don't want to be the guy in a year who has to 'admit' to buying the 13" Macbook Pro. Overview Pros & Cons Reviews Similar To Price: 829. Apple MacBook Air (Core i7 3667U, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD) 3h 7m 5h 23m Asus ZenBook UX31 (Core i7 2667M, 4GB RAM, 256GB SSD) 3h 22m 5h 21m Toshiba Satellite U840W (Core i5 3317U, 6GB RAM. As a result, documents it as a single model - the MacBook Pro 'Core i5' 2.5 13' (Retina) with acknowledgement of the two configurations and respective order numbers. I know the specs weren't that spectacular compared to the old white macbook, but they were enough to make me decide it was worth the extra money - if I were buying now, I'm not so sure that'd be the case.ĭon't get me wrong, I still think that for £899 the 13" Macbook Pro is a good notebook, but this has soured my 'First Apple' experience a little. The standard 13-Inch 'Late 2012' Retina Display MacBook Pro originally was offered in two configurations that only differ by storage capacity.
Macbook 13 vs macbook pro 13 mid 2012 Bluetooth#
All of these models include 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, Gigabit Ethernet, a single Firewire '800' port, two USB 3.0 ports, a ' Thunderbolt ' port that supports an external display at 2560x1600 as well as other peripherals that are compatible with. My point is why bring out a new 'pro' model, when, within 120 days(!) it's going to be a 'pretty' version of the base model? Connectivity on the 13-Inch and 15-Inch 'Mid-2012' MacBook Pro models is almost identical. I understand where you're coming from, and I know that this is another one of those 'Apple updated just after I bought' threads - and I'm VERY happy with my mac.īut, I'm a little cynical as to why Apple bought out the macbook pro 13, when they knew that four months later, they were going to be bringing out this new macbook? I know technology moves fast nowadays and what you can get now will be outclassed in a year's time I understand this.
0 kommentar(er)
